They see Jules ridin’, they be hatin’.
Seriously, what the hell is wrong with people who are
offended by the site of a bicycle? My friend Jules and her hubby the Bike
Monkee found this note on their car Saturday after they finished a ride on
Eagle River.
Yes, I said ON Eagle River. They were riding on ice and
snow. You couldn’t even make an argument that they were causing trail erosion
or damage because, come spring, the “trail” will cease to exist when it melts
and flows downstream. And they were riding fat bikes, not Kawasakis, so they
weren’t making noise.
Some grumpy bastard just didn’t like the sight of two people
on bicycles. So he had to try to piss on their good time by arrogantly leaving
a note to say the trail isn’t open to bikes until snowmachines are allowed to
run on it. Yeah, snowmachines. Much of the winter, the river is open to
screaming, exhaust-belching machines. And this bastard is worried a couple of
bicycles.
I haven’t bothered to look up the law cited in the note, nor
do I plan to do so. But I’d be willing to bet that the logic behind the rule –
if there is any – would be related to safety. When public officials determine
the ice is thick enough to support snowmachines, it’s obviously strong enough
to support bicycles. So that’s an easy, no-risk time to say, “Yep, you can ride
your bike on the river now.”
But people routinely spend time on frozen lakes and rivers
before the ice gets super thick. The grouch who scribbled his note was probably
doing the same thing. My guess is that he didn’t give a rat’s ass about whether
Julie and Monkee were in danger. I think he just wanted the place to himself.
Maybe he even saw his method of travel, whether it was on foot, skis or snowshoes,
to be more “pure.”
Screw that guy.
A fat bike on snow is about as close as you can get to a
zero-impact vehicle. And anybody you see riding one is probably going to be one
of the nicest people you’ll meet on the trail.
To hell with the haters. You could never please them anyway.
Go ride your bikes and be happy.